OXException: CTX-0010 Context "defaultcontext" cannot be found

[MaikL80]

Greetings,

I want to try out Open-Exchange as a replacement for Microsoft exchange, so I created a virtual machine (CentOS7) and followed these instructions:
https://oxpedia.org/wiki/index.php?t...uide_for_RHEL7
There is no hint, that I needed an imap server, so this took me a while to understand. Nontheless I created a second virtual machine with a Dovecot Server. This server is attached to our Active Directory System.
So when I try to add a user, I would do the following:
createuser -c 1 -A oxadmin -P admin_password -u testuser \ -d "Test User" -g Test -s User -p secret -e testuser@imap.example.com \ --imaplogin testuser --imapserver imap.iexample.com --smtpserver imap.example.comBut when I try to login, I get the following error message:

om.openexchange.exception.OXException: CTX-0010 Categories=USER_INPUT Message='Context "defaultcontext" cannot be found.'

On the Dovecot side, it seems, that the user is authenticated:

imap-login: Info: Login: user=<USER>, method=PLAIN, rip=172.1x.x.x lip=172..x.x.x, mpid=26208, TLS, session=

I tired to change things around in the imapauth.properties and imap.properties, but nothing seems to work.
I hope I can get a hint, where to start searching.

Greeting Maik

[Wolfgang Rosenauer]

The error message you are getting seems that you try to login with "testuser". If you want to login without a context identifier like this you need to mark one context as "defaultcontext". Please check changecontext --help how to set a "loginmapping".
Alternatively to see if that is really the issue, please try to login via testuser@1 (where 1 is the context id you used to create the first context.

[MaikL80]

Hello Wolfgang,
Many thanks for the tip. I used the createcontext and added the internal name of the server for "-L" (--addmapping).
I didn´t recognize the importance of the context. In all examples there is just "defaultcontext" but I thought it is just a name, but in fact it is the, like the name implies, defaultcontext. Just a dumb error and if I did read the documentation closer, I wouldn´t used it like that.
Many thanks again.
Maik

P.S. is it possible to tag this thread as "resolved"?